Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Popular Culture and its Effect on my Life



 

Imagination is the act or power of forming a mental image of something not present to the senses or never before wholly perceived in reality. Religion is a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe.  Philosophy is the critical study of the basic principles and concepts of a particular branch of knowledge, especially with a view to improving or reconstituting them. (Dictionary.com) In popular culture there is not a movie, book, or religious sect that do not have some aspect of these three concepts.  In this essay I do not want to discuss there differences (as there are many) but rather find how each of these concepts have affected me (through there application in popular culture) in my life and how I believe they are intricately related.

 Since I was a child I had a huge fascination with imagination, ingenuity, and the future.  Growing up I watched films like Star Wars and Star Trek.  Science fiction a steadfast catalyst to my own imaginary characters and ideas of what the future holds.  I was always fascinated with the concept of technology, the future, and how my faith played into that view.  I found myself posting quotes from Albert Einstein, “I am enough of an artist to draw freely upon my imagination. Imagination is more important than knowledge. Knowledge is limited. Imagination encircles the world.” (goodreads.com)  Excited to see what the future holds, to my delight, as technology grew, many of the concepts I had seen on television and in science fiction movies were being developed for real use application.  An perfect example is the iPad. 

As I grew up, I developed a love for science.  Taking class after class relating to biology, astrology, and human development.  As much as I believed in the science that I was being taught many people that shared my faith believed I was taking believes that were not of God, as my own.  In their perception I suppose they were right but I could not help but think that science, imagination, and faith were all on the same side somehow; that they were intricately connected in some way.  How exactly was it that religion, philosophy, and imagination are connected?  Most people would argue that they had nothing to offer the other, that these concepts and beliefs were polar opposites fighting for their claim of truth.
 
It was not until I was watching a popular preacher (Christian Popular Culture) named Louie Giglio that I found the answers I was looking for.  He preached a sermon called, “Indescribable.”  He describes science and faith as being on the same path of discovery, both searching for truth.  As I watched it had a profound affect on confirming what I had already believed. 

Then a book called, “The Secret” came out.  It was all about how thoughts manifest into things.  This philosophy had taken root and further confirmed what I already believed.  In imagination, we are free of limitation, free to create something new, and as history of civilization has proved from the creation of the wheel, to the Hubble telescope: That this philosophy was true.  Thoughts (imagination) manifest into things.

With these three completely different concepts at how to look at life, I found the answers I was looking for.  And to think, it all started with Star Wars, a Sermon, and The Secret.  It is funny that the use of popular culture has affected me is such a reflective way, but I am thankful for it.



Microreflection


The most interesting information that I learned last week from our in class discussion was what to look for to confirm whether or not a source online is a good source or a bad source.  Not only do you really have to use critical thinking but you need to have a knowledge that the Internet uses a signature of sorts to help us identify whether the website is a good source. ( Examples are: .gov  or .edu) The class discussion was quite educational and fun.  I loved the medical website and the Bigfoot website, they were both real (go figure) and hilarious! Thanks! :)

Book vs Movie

 
Chronicles of Narnia

The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe




I chose to compare The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe to be my movie versus book analysis.  I would like to think that I am a book lover and a movie lover for much of the same reasons.  They are a way to escape the perils of everyday and enter a world of imagination, each character coming alive with each word.  A world with no limitations and a way that I too with the help of the author create characters I fall in love with.  While movies allow me to just enjoy someone else’s imagination through the use of film and computer graphics.  Visual effects, music, and the actor/actress bring to life a book I love.  


Personally I find that if I read a book prior to the making of a film, I almost never like it.  In this case, I loved The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe.  The book and movie were so similar; it was as if C.S. Lewis himself wrote the screenplay for the film.  Because the film was so parallel to the book I had a difficult time discerning their differences. So I had to read the children’s book all over again.  The greatest thing about it was that it was just as good as the first time I read this series as a child.

One of the differences between the book and the movie is that the book is a very easy read.  Large print, designed for audiences from ages eight and up, it has a certain classic appeal to it.  The illustrations were simple, and tasteful, very similar to the illustrations of Winnie the Pooh.   




While the movie was intense with vivid color, dramatized graphics, creating Narnia as a magical and surreal world.  The cinematography striking, literally taking you to another place, another world.   



One of the parts of the book that was missing from the film was in a scene when Father Christmas comes to greet the beloved four characters: Peter, Susan, Edmund, and Lucy.  He gives them each their destined weapon.  Explaining their role in Narnia and what is expected of them.  After giving their gifts/destined weapons, Father Christmas pulls out from his red bad, piping hot tea for all to enjoy before they continue their journey.  In the film, this scene is completely taken out.  I believe the screenwriters took it out because it held no significance to the plot of the film, thus not using the scene from the book.

In the book C.S. Lewis describes the beloved Aslan, the Lion, Ruler of all Narnia and known on earth by many names, as so intense, so radiant, that one trembles in his presence.  That his eyes so penetrating that you could not look into his face.  In the film, Aslan the Lion is portrayed as gentle strength.  So gentle that he often comes to young Lucy because of her unshakable faith.  I believe that the film makers made Aslan come across as gentle strength because had they made Aslan fierce, he would have come across as evil but since he is a good and righteous character they made him beautiful, gentle, and a great leader, using the voice of Liam Neeson to give authority to the character.



There was very few differences between the film and the book but the differences mentioned above were all necessary on behalf of the film makers.  They created a film the proceeded the expectations of the book merely by re-creating Narnia.  The book is sweet, sincere, and has beautiful illustrations; but the film helped the book sort of grow up and turn into something incredible.  I love both the book and the film because they compliment each other and support each others talents not to mention they are appropriate for all ages and will continue to influence generations to come. 

References: